Can we stop pretending now? Can we admit out loud now that people we know and love were hurt, and some killed, by the Covid jabs?
I understand you may not want to admit that. But now it can no longer be denied:
This article was published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal “Vaccines” on May 17th, 2023. The title does not say it all. So I’ll quote its Abstract’s last two sentences:
“emerging evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism; rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals.”
Repeated mRNA jabs not only can increase long-term susceptibility to Covid, but may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote both cancer growth and myocarditis due to the immune system dysfunction that results from the jabs.
This is shockingly bad news.
Our immune systems have the unenviable job of continually determining what is us, and what is not us, and to attack and dispel anything inside of us that is not us.
It turns out that directly injecting genetic material (mRNA) into people's arms — with the mRNA hiding in lipid nanoparticles that sneak the mRNA into cells, thereby tricking our own cells to mass produce patented spike proteins — somehow confuses our immune systems enough so they can't properly distinguish what is us, and what is not us.
Immune systems can no longer distinguish Sars-CoV2 or cancers as needing to be attacked. The result is the opposite in the case of autoimmune diseases. Our immune system somehow mistakes our own heart tissue (Autoimmune Myocarditis) or nervous system (Guillain-Barre Syndrome) as not us, and begins to attack it — attack us.
The article linked above goes into great detail on the exact bio-chemical pathways involved behind this immune system dysfunction; specifically a dramatic increase in the prevalence of IGg4 antibodies relative to our other antibodies.
This is one of those things that, often times, you can only find out about a novel drug after long-term testing. This is why we do long-term testing before mass-marketing drugs to millions or billions of people. To see if things like this show up.
Will the harms from the immune system dysfunctions of people who took repeated mRNA jabs overshadow the medical harms of Covid itself? Only time will continue to tell.
Are our health officials even keeping statistics for all-cause hospitalization and all-cause mortality for jabbed versus un-jabbed folks?
Regardless, what are we to do about all the immune system dysfunction which now may exist within the majority of our population?
On a societal level, we need to respond how we responded to most health emergencies before Covid — by having an open conversation between clinical doctors and researchers about the medical details behind the problem, and by amassing as much clinical experience as possible on what actually works.
Note: there are no known medical procedures to successfully heal previous heart damage from myocarditis. One could (potentially?) heal one’s immune system dysfunction, which could stop any further damage to one’s heart, but any existing damage one may have is with you for the rest of your life.
Admittedly, I do not know how to say what I need to say next. I have a huge mixture of feelings about it. What I do know is that I have to get it out now as honestly as I can.
I apologize somewhat for writing much of this to "you". "You" may apply to you. "You" may not apply to you. Take it how you may.
On a personal level, what can you do as an individual to respond to this horrible tragedy, this new health emergency?
My recommendation is that if you were one who supported the jab mandates, if you supported doctors and nurses getting fired over refusing the jabs; to find at least one of those doctors or nurses who were fired, and apologize to them personally.
And don't stop there, if you are someone with means, financially support that person to research what works best to heal the mRNA-induced immune system dysfunction.
And don't stop there either, but actively support the open cultural conversation of all doctors and researchers working to heal this dysfunction within all who took the jabs.
Remember, this horrible news about how the Covid jabs may cause an immune system dysfunction is not why the jab mandates were wrong. The mandates were wrong because they willfully ignored this very possibility which exists with all novel drugs.
You knew that it was inhumane to force a person to take a novel drug for which nobody knew the long-term consequences.
For goodness sake, these are the very first words of the Nuremberg Code: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”
The Nuremberg Code was a set of ethical principles about medical experiments that grew out of the Nuremberg Trials of the Nazis after WWII.
A novel drug is by definition a medical experiment, since nobody knows the long-term consequences of that drug. A person must grant their consent to any medical experiment.
You knew this since the Nazis. But somehow you forgot, and you supported mandates for novel drugs. Not just that, you took it a step further, and also went along with the demonization of those who refused to take the novel drugs.
You fell for propaganda that pierced deep inside you and hit you right in your care bone.
You fell for propaganda that told you that "caring people" get jabbed, and that to not get jabbed is to not care for others. You were hit right there, deep in your care bone.
You fell for a narrative that said that in order to be a caring person, not only did you need to take a novel drug for which nobody knew the long-term consequences, but that you also needed to demand the firing of doctors and nurses —
who had dedicated their lives to study and practice medicine, who had finished medical school with six figures of debt with a specific plan to repay that debt by working as a doctor or nurse, who had literally risked their lives taking care of Covid patients for over a year, who most certainly had been exposed to Covid and had natural immunity,
— if they refused to take the novel drug! As if you were in a better position to know whether they should take the drug than they were!!!
And because some people, specifically soldiers, are people who can’t simply “quit” their jobs, you quite literally forced many soldiers to take the jab against their will!
And perhaps even worse than all of that, you supported the censoring and shutting down of the cultural conversation that could have potentially spared the long-term health of your own immune system and those of whom you love.
I pray you do not fall for such horrific propaganda again.
I want to err on the side of extra clarity here:
The fact that the jabs were indeed not “safe and effective” is not what made the mandates immoral. That just made them even more tragic.
The fact that the entire mRNA platform for the jabs was completely novel is not what made the mandates immoral. That just made them even more tragic.
As the Nuremberg Code states, a person must consent to any medical experiment. All novel drugs are medical experiments. A mandate for a novel drug is a crime against humanity. Period.
We humans need to get very clear on how propaganda can hit us in the care bone. Because it will certainly happen again. (It’s happening all the time now!)
Care-Bone Propaganda is not the last nor only propaganda trick used against us.
It’s just the predominant and most effective propaganda trick used against us right now.
Be mindful. We must maintain any coherency we can muster right now.
The place for mainstream corporate media is in the compost pile. Let it rot.
Again, I want to err on the side of extra clarity here:
Never mandate a novel drug again.
Never shut down our cultural conversation about a novel drug again.
Never assume that people you don’t know are deplorable and don’t care about anybody else – just because someone tells you so. Particularly if the person telling you has a huge conflict of interest.
Thanks.
And thank you for your time and attention. Take care.
I resonate very deeply with what you wrote. Unfortunately so many are still in denial and will not admit it. I don't know if it's because they are not seeing this info on msm or the admission would spiral a cascade of shame and guilt that would absolutely crush their ego structure and the fear of them having to face their self afflicted possible harm to their health would just be too much. I just don't know. As Mark Twain said "It's easier to fool a man than persuade him he's been fooled". Keep up the good work C-H!
Yes, you understood what I meant by "strong stance". I hear you acknowledging the severe consequences (e.g. increased death, morbidity, job loss, etc.) that arose from those who supported forcing others to undergo a medical experiment against their will. And, therefore, wanting to be direct about these severe consequences. I think I was more speaking to a little more nuanced approach getting to that point. I don't disagree with your sentiment. I also want people to hear it. And maybe with various approaches, people with various dispositions will hear this crucial information.
In regards to the scientific backing of your statements, when you do bring in this other research it starts to really paint a picture. I've read your other posts and for some who might have not read them, they might be out of the loop and reading this one journal article might not be enough to validate your conclusions. In some ways, I wish you added these citations to your article. And I know that you want to make the information not be too much or overwhelming, so people are willing and have the time to read it.
I definitely wouldn't label your article as being abusive. And, yes, the media campaign to get people to vaccinate and ridicule the unvaccinated was appalling, at the least. I could go on and on about this, but we're on the same page and your video does a lot to elucidate how intense the media was around this. With that said, I felt like there was a polarization that happened "the vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated". And, I think I try my best to avoid this dynamic by trying to have a more relational way of having conversations about this. Which is definitely hard on the internet. Again, I can see the reason for being outraged and understand how you want to express yourself. I'm just explaining my position. And the truth is, we probably need both of our stances to bridge the divisiveness around this issue and to re-prioritize the socio-cultural ethics and obviously a re-education with pragmatic scientific research that have been imprinted on a big chunk of the population. Also, looking at how fear was used time and time again during the pandemic, which led to where we are right now is crucial. When we are under significant fear, parts of brain become less accessible (e.g. frontal cortex, which is responsible for conscious decision making) and this played and continues to play a huge role in how people maneuver through these times.